Cornell University ProDairy



NYSERDA-Supported Ag(Projects) for Improving Manure Management: Anaerobic Digestion
    
Contractor:  Matlink Dairy Farm
Project #:  6252
Contact:  Ted Mathews 716.355.2296
Sector:  Dairy
Size:  650 milking cows
Technology/End Products  Anaerobic digestion with CHP using manure and food processing waste
Project Type & Status:  Demonstration - digester and CHP system operating
NYSERDA Funding:  $200,000
Total Project Budget:  $449,085

Project Documents

Case Studies  Anaerobic Digester at Matlink Dairy Farm
Posters  Mixed Digester with Manure and Food Waste Addition - Economics 2004
   Mixed Digester with Manure and Food Waste Addition - Description 2004
   Mixed Digester with Manure and Food Waste Addition - Results 2004


Lessons Learned from this Project

Food Waste
Anaerobic digester demonstration illustrating environmental benefits
Although the food waste brings in additional solids to the digestion system fewer solids are in the effluent than when just manure is digested. The extra energy of the food waste apparently makes it possible for additional solids destruction. Solids were broken down in the effluent storage as well. The existing manure storage was about one half full of manure solids when digested effluent was introduced. After two years of operation, the solids in the storage are almost all gone without excessive agitation.

Food Waste
Anaerobic digester demonstration illustrating environmental benefits
The food waste is high in energy having three times the gas production per unit of mass than manure, yet the nutrient content is comparable to manure so imported nutrients are kept low. Not all farms can take advantage of this. Only farms that have a land base that can accept the extra nutrients should consider this option.

Food Waste
Anaerobic digester demonstration illustrating environmental benefits
Gas handling pipes, flares and enterprises for energy use need to be used for the additional production that a food waste system will require. Pre-planning and analysis of potential food waste should be done to estimate the gas production and the size of the utilization equipment.

Food Waste
Anaerobic digester demonstration illustrating environmental benefits
Accepting food waste is highly profitable. The tipping fees make the manure treatment system a profit center for the farm. This is a win-win-win situation. The farm gets a payment to accept the food waste and the extra energy as the volatile solids are converted to methane, the food company has an environmentally responsible and relatively cheap way to get rid of their waste product and the nutrients from the food waste are recycled back to the land while green energy is produced.

Heat
Anaerobic digester demonstration illustrating environmental benefits
The waste heat given off by the engine generator is significant. Utilizing the coolant to heat the influent and maintain the digester temperature and using it for heat exchangers for hot water in the calf barn and milking parlor still requires a radiator to dissipate extra heat. Even in the winter the un-insulated engine building is very warm. This makes a very good heated shop and should be used for that function.

Mixed Digestion
Anaerobic digester demonstration illustrating environmental benefits
The mixed digester performs well and offers flexibility in operation accepting various consistencies of manure and food waste mixtures. By mixing the influent into the total volume of the digester, the biomass that has been built up in the digester can attack all the new feed. Even though some of the influent goes out of the digester the first day, the total volatile solids reduction is significant and the volatile acids (indicators for odor production) are low.

System Design
Anaerobic digester demonstration illustrating environmental benefits
The design of the anaerobic digestion system including manure handling, gas collection, gas utilization, and digester heating should not just be designed by each individual component but designed as a system. This site experienced a beam failure due to lateral loads that were not anticipated by the concrete designer. If the concrete design had been better integrated with the rest of the project they may have realized that lateral loads could develop.